Right. You’ve been to the exhibition, you’ve considered the artwork and presentation, you’ve taken copious notes, now you’re ready to put it all together. If you are working with magazine style specifications follow those instructions exactly; your editor will count on you to deliver articles that meet the style specs. If you don’t have those guidelines, head the article with this information laid out on your professional letterhead:
Your Name: Exhibition Title
Venue Name
Website
Venue Address
Exhibition Dates
An exhibition review is roughly 800 words, some magazines require fewer words and some allow more. It has a basic structure of introduction, discussion, and closing information. Introduce the exhibition by communicating the show premise as stated by the curator. Present the curator and her relationship to the premise, the exhibition and/or the venue bringing in background career information which is relevant to the situation. Introduce the artists chosen by the curator stating the artists’ relationship to the premise and/or reasons why the curator chose them. If it is a large show with a lot of artists, introduce them as the group, school or historical period they’re with then talk about individuals in the body of your review. The introduction is also the place to introduce your review theme. If you see a different angle on the premise or a sub-text which is suggested by the show but not discussed, or simply your agreement or disagreement with the premise; whatever your take on the show, state it here. This will lead you into the body of your review and discussion of the works. All this should happen in the first paragraph or two.
When discussing the work, a good place to start is with what you find most striking. Be sure to ‘situate’ the artwork by clearly describing the work, what the artists intentions were for the piece, and place it historically by date and artistic movement. While describing artwork is vital to a review, don’t make the fatal mistake of stopping at the description – add your own insights, comments and opinions; these should build on the review theme presented in your introduction. Your insights are the reason people will read your review. You’re making a case for or against the exhibition and to do so properly, it is important to give examples and reasons. It’s not necessary to talk about every piece of art in the show, just discuss the ones pertinent to your theme. A good fleshy theme will present several examples and sound reasoning which moves the reader through the exhibition.
End the review by giving some background on the venue if your audience is unlikely to be familiar with it, including the relationship to the curator, artists or exhibition, if noteworthy. Give touring information if the show travels or info on other events or products scheduled with the exhibition. You could also mention any major awards pending or just received by the artists, curator or venue.
It’s likely you will be sending images with your review. Be sure they are sized and formatted correctly for you magazine or on-line destination. You should also type up corresponding caption information to accompany your review; make sure this information is titled in such a way that obviously relates to the information in the image file names. It’s no good naming your first caption #1a when there is no #1a in the file name of the image. Be sure to duplicate the exhibition information at the top of the page so the caption list can be easily identified with your review.
Caption information should include:
Artist Name
Title of Work
Date of Work
Medium
Dimensions
Courtesy of the Artist and Gallery Name
Photographer’s Credit
It’s likely all this information will be contained in the file name of the image.
So that’s it! Good luck and happy reviewing.
Further Reading:
In a short comparison of styles, Megan Abrahams writes a well-balanced piece on L.A. RAW: Abject Expressionism. Patricia Cronin reviews the same exhibition presenting an insightful and well developed thematic viewpoint of the premise. Her review pulls out the ‘abject’ palpably while furnishing important historical information and relationships.














